Samsung Neo QLED 4K QN90D (GQ55QN90D, 2024) vs LG OLED evo C4 (OLED65C43LA, 2024)
Samsung Neo QLED 4K QN90D (GQ55QN90D, 2024) and LG OLED evo C4 (OLED65C43LA, 2024) are both televisions, compared here on public manufacturer specifications. The LG OLED evo C4 (OLED65C43LA, 2024) leads on refresh rate (120 vs 100 Hz). Every figure here comes from a manufacturer product or datasheet page, verify against the primary source before relying on it for a purchase.
Full data
Full spec sheet
Key differences
The specs that decide it — winner marked.
| Samsung Neo QLED 4K QN90D (GQ55QN90D, 2024) | LG OLED evo C4 (OLED65C43LA, 2024) | |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size (in) | 55 in | 65 in ✓ |
| Refresh rate (Hz) | 100 Hz | 120 Hz ✓ |
| Energy (A–G) | F | F |
| Samsung Neo QLED 4K QN90D (GQ55QN90D, 2024)
Wins 1/4 | LG OLED evo C4 (OLED65C43LA, 2024)
Wins 3/4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ||
| Refresh rate (Hz) | 100 Hz | 120 Hz ✓ |
| Speaker power (W) | 60 W ✓ | 40 W |
| Capacity | ||
| Screen size (in) | 55 in | 65 in ✓ |
| Energy & running cost | ||
| Energy class (A–G) | F | F |
| Annual energy (kWh/yr) | 107 kWh/yr | N/A |
| Features | ||
| HDMI ports | 4 | 4 |
| USB ports | 2 | 3 ✓ |
Frequently asked questions
Which uses less energy? +
The Samsung Neo QLED 4K QN90D (GQ55QN90D, 2024) uses the least energy, at an estimated 107 kWh per year.
Is the Samsung Neo QLED 4K QN90D (GQ55QN90D, 2024) better than the LG OLED evo C4 (OLED65C43LA, 2024)? +
On the public specs we track, the LG OLED evo C4 (OLED65C43LA, 2024) leads on 2 of 2 headline metrics. See the full spec sheet for the metric-by-metric breakdown.
Where does this comparison data come from? +
Every figure in the table is sourced from manufacturer product and datasheet pages and is verifiable on each product's spec page. CompareHomeAppliances does not accept vendor placement.
Keep exploring